USPTO serial 74235327
LALIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 1997
- Examiner
- MASIELLO, ANTHO
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LALIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75008 Paris, FR
75008 Paris, FR
75008 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Patch
MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | scarves and shawls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |