USPTO serial 74235579
DUAL-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUAL-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Hubbard
ROBERT R HUBBARD GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATIONHIGH RIDGE PARKBOX 10010STAMFORD, CT 06904Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | emergency lights; battery powered transfer circuitry to provide continuing operation of normally on electric lamps in the event of power outage and battery powered transfer circuitry to provide emergency power to electrical systems; cable assemblies; namely, multi-function cable assemblies, extender cables, lighting cable assemblies, extender cables, lighting cables, distribution box cables drops,connectors and fixture modules | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDWARDS COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Dual-Lite, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by G. S. BUILDING SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DUAL-LITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |