USPTO serial 74235687
BACCHUS D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BACCHUS D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | soft drinks | ABANDONED | May 4, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 17, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |