USPTO serial 74235865
MODUL-R
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1962495Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 1996
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MODUL-R?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, L4K 4L2, CA
Don Mills, Ontario, M3B 2T8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil McFater
NEIL MCFATER DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST WSTE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security products, namely fire alarm systems comprising fire alarm control units, detectors, indicators, remote annunciations, and visual indicators, fire protection systems comprising fire alarm control units, detectors and audible and visual indicators, electronic life safety systems comprising fire alarm control units, emergency voice communicators, emergency telephone systems, detectors, audible and visual indicators, electronic emergency voice communication systems comprising amplifiers, speaker supervisory circuits, indicating appliance devices consisting of horns and speakers, visual indicators, annunciators and control units, fire and security systems listed for proprietary application comprising fire alarm control units and burglar alarm control units, detectors and audible and visual indicators, building security management and monitoring systems comprising audible and visual indicators, fire detection devices listed for proprietary application, namely fire alarm control units, and associated audible and visual indicators, property protection security and monitoring alarm systems comprising fire alarm control units, detectors, emergency voice communicators and audible and visual indicators listed for proprietary application | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |