Drawing for BOSTON SCOLIOSIS BRACE

USPTO serial 74235885

BOSTON SCOLIOSIS BRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSTON SCOLIOSIS BRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irving M. Kriegsman

IRVING M KRIEGSMAN883 EDGELL RDFRAMINGHAM, MA 01701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010scoliosis braceABANDONEDDec 22, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 15, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance