Drawing for SPIDER MAP

USPTO serial 74235965

SPIDER MAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIDER MAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent M. Amberly

VINCENT M AMBERLY MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCESTE 10001225 EYE ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal platforms incorporating metal shackles, pins, rings and crampons, all for climbing purposes; strings, harnesses, straps and braces, all being made of metal and for handling loads; tension links, friction blocks and hand grips; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsABANDONEDApr 23, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance