USPTO serial 74235972
JOSEPH AND THE AMAZING DREAMCOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOSEPH AND THE AMAZING DREAMCOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | name plates, ornaments, plaques, statues, statuettes, figurines, key rings, key fobs, key blanks, key chains, money boxes; all the above goods being made of non-precious metals | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1993 |
| 009 | television sets, radios, video cassette recorders, video disc players, phonographs, and audio receivers, pre-recorded audio and video cassette tapes containing musical and dramatic works, blank audio and video tapes; magnetic and optical discs all for recording sound or video; and accessories therefor; sunglasses, sunglass cases | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1993 |
| 016 | writing paper and envelopes; printed publications in the form of theatrical programmes, books, newspapers and magazines; posters, unmounted photographs and photograph albums; greeting cards and postcards, decalcomanias, ordinary playing cards, covers for cheque books | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1993 |
| 025 | sweatshirts, T-shirts, shirts, shorts, trousers, socks, blousons, caps, training shoes, and basketball shoes | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1993 |
| 035 | licensing of stage plays and musical shows | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Really Useful Group Limited, The
- Other trademarks owned by Really Useful Group Limited, The
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named JOSEPH AND THE AMAZING DREAMCOAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 1995 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 1994 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |