USPTO serial 74235996
BERLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2000 Hamburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Bendekgey
LEE BENDEKGEY GRAHAM & JAMESONE MARITIME PLZ STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery; eau de toilette; soaps; bubble bath; bath and shower oil, bath and shower gel; sun protection and sun care products; namely, sunscreen, suntan oil and after sun lotion; antiperspirant; deodorants for personal use; articles for personal and beauty care; namely, face and eye moisturizing and cleansing creams; body and face powder; body and face lotion; rouge; eyebrow pencil; eyeshadow; eyelash black; lipsticks and face masks; articles for hair care; namely, shampoo conditioner, cream rinse, hair spray, mousse and gel; depilatory cream; shaving cream; shaving foam and gel; aftershave lotion; skin cleansing cream; nail enamel; nail enamel remover | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |