USPTO serial 74236243
WHITE ROSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE ROSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ADVANCED AGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Unionville, Ontario L3R 2L5, CA
ADVANCED AGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Unionville, Ontario L3R 2L5, CA
Unionville, Ontario L3R 2L5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L. B. Matthews
CAROL L B MATTHEWS MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCE655 15TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | garden hoses | ABANDONED | Aug 11, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED AGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED AGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE ROSE NURSERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named WHITE ROSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1998 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |