USPTO serial 74236498
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. Schwab
BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDONE MARKET PLZSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper party napkins, decorative cardboard wall cutouts, decorative cardboard table cutouts, paper posters, decorative cardboard street signs, decorative cardboard humorous sign sets, paper pennants, decorative cardboard stand up figures, paper party bibs, decorative honeycomb tissue figures, paper tissue garlands, paper flags, and paper table coverings | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | plastic party banners | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |