USPTO serial 74236937
RAINBOW WAFERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINBOW WAFERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT T. JOHNSON
ROBERT T JOHNSON BELL, BOYD & LLCSTE 3200 THREE FIRST NATL PLZ7O W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies | ABANDONED | May 9, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |