USPTO serial 74236991
PARTY DOGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 1993
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARTY DOGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Memphis, TN
Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Memphis, TN
Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Memphis, TN
Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Hodum
CHARLES E HODUM155 N MAIN STE 203COLLIERVILLE, TN 38017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | corn dogs; namely, hot dogs on a stick, which have been dipped in batter and deep fried, then coated with mustard | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 11, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Doris, Richard and Don Langston partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PARTY DOGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |