USPTO serial 74237173
DEANNA DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEANNA DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20144 MILANO, IT
20144 MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold D. Steinberg
HAROLD D STEINBERG STEINBERG & RASKIN1140 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, suits, dresses, jackets, blazers, coats, raincoats, skirts, trousers, jeans; knitted wearing apparel; namely, shirts, sweaters, pullovers, jerseys, socks; footwear; namely, shoes, boots, sandals; scarves, hats and caps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |