Drawing for WESCOM

USPTO serial 74237988

WESCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WESCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery

JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer products not used for engineering and surveying software or in telecommunications applications, namely computer cables, hard disk controllers, casings, computer buffers, computer interface boards, mother boards, display adapters, computer monitors, computer printers, computer keyboards; computer apparatus comprised or microcomputers; computers; data processing equipment, namely intelligent terminals, dummy terminals; micro-processors; laser printers; computer hardware; computer firmware for use in operating computer systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 1997ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 7, 1997OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 1, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 26, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance