Drawing for SAINT PETERSBOURG

USPTO serial 74238105

SAINT PETERSBOURG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAINT PETERSBOURG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Peter Ludwig

S PETER LUDWIG DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cleaning and polishing preparations; namely, laundry bleach, blueing for laundry, cleaning preparations and detergents for laundry use; spot and stain removers; all-purpose cleaning preparations; polishing, scouring and abrasive cleaning preparations; soaps for hand, face and body; perfume and eau de cologne; essential oils for personal use; essential oils for use in the manufacture of cosmetics, perfume and soaps; aromatic oils for use in the manufacture of perfume; namely, badian essence, ambergris and bergamot oil; a full line of cosmetics; dentrifices; sun tanning preparations; bathing preparations; namely, bath salts, bath gels, and bath oils; nail polishing preparations; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; eye, face and skin moisturizing and cleansing creams, potpourri in the form of scented wood chips; mouthwash; hair polish, hair lotions, hair colorants and hair shampoo; skin cleansers and make-up removing preparations; cosmetics; namely, lavender water, scented water and toilet water; incense; depilatory preparations; extracts of flowers for cosmetic purposes, sachets for perfuming linen; false nails; cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes; shaving preparations; talcum powderABANDONED—
025clothing; namely, boots, shoes, slippers, bathing suits, stockings, suspenders, belts, hats, socks, beach shoes, shirts, chemises, tights, undergarments, underwear, baby pants, neckties, scarves, shawls, fur coats, fur jackets, fur stoles, gabardines, gloves, vests, rainwear, skirts, layettes, beach clothes, coats, trousers, pullovers, pajamas, dresses, sport shoes, uniforms and jacketsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 1994ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 25, 1994OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 1993OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance