USPTO serial 74238113
JANALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JANALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, curl moisturizing conditioner; scalp petroleum jelly treatment; perm relaxer; special sensitive scalp petroleum jelly base; facial lines and blemishes cover cream; aloe GEO face cleansing masque; make-up; namely, pressed powder, liquid cream powder, lipstick, rouge, mascara and eye liner; nail polish color enhancer; lipstick contour stick, and eye liner pencil | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |