Drawing for TAMKO GLASS-SEAL

USPTO serial 74238398

TAMKO GLASS-SEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POMPEY, TINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAMKO GLASS-SEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher R. Benson

CHRISTOPHER R BENSON ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019roofing products; namely, self-sealing fiberglass shinglesABANDONEDJul 13, 1978

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance