USPTO serial 74238429
ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cleo P. Braver
CLEO P BRAVER ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS CORPORATION3700 KOPPERS STBALTIMORE, MD 21227UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | air pollution control apparatus; namely, wet electrostatic precipitators, dry electrostatic precipitators, dry horizontal precipitators, wet flue gas scrubbers, dry flue gas scrubbers, semi-dry flue gas scrubbers, circulating fluidized bed reactors, flue gas conditioning systems, reverse air fabric filters, pulse jet fabric filters, continuous emission monitors, and component and accessory parts thereof, including electronic controls, control panels, rigid electrodes, collecting surfaces, hoppers, duct work, rappers, filter bags, tensioning devices, dampers and manifolds | ABANDONED | Jun 7, 1990 |
| 009 | air pollution control apparatus; namely, wet electrostatic precipitators, dry electrostatic precipitators, dry horizontal precipitators, wet flue gas scrubbers, dry flue gas scrubbers, semi-dry flue gas scrubbers, circulating fluidized bed reactors, flue gas conditioning systems, reverse air fabric filters, pulse jet fabric filters, continuous emission monitors, and component and accessory parts thereof, including electronic controls, control panels, rigid electrodes, collecting surfaces, hoppers, duct work, rappers, filter bags, tensioning devices, dampers and manifolds | ABANDONED | Jun 7, 1990 |
| 011 | air pollution control apparatus; namely, wet electrostatic precipitators, dry electrostatic precipitators, dry horizontal precipitators, wet flue gas scrubbers, dry flue gas scrubbers, semi-dry flue gas scrubbers, circulating fluidized bed reactors, flue gas conditioning systems, reverse air fabric filters, pulse jet fabric filters, continuous emission monitors, and component and accessory parts thereof, including electronic controls, control panels, rigid electrodes, collecting surfaces, hoppers, duct work, rappers, filter bags, tensioning devices, dampers and manifolds | ABANDONED | Jun 7, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Environmental Equipment Service Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE CORPORATION
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |