USPTO serial 74238640
NOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KULICK, LIZBETH B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry Klein
HENRY KLEIN C/O LADAS & PARRY3600 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1520LOS ANGELES, CA 90010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, face cream and cosmetic sticks for use on the lips and on the body; body lotions and oil, toilet soaps; personal deodorants, suntan preparations; namely, self tanning creams, anti-wrinkle rapid tan creams, tan stimulator creams, anti-wrinkle suntan creams, anti-age maximum protection, moisturizing suntan creams, waterproof protection emulsions, waterproof tanning emulsions, suntan milk fluid, fast tanning gel, noon soon quick suntan, dry invisible oils, body after sun, face after sun, long tan performance, sun repair shampoos, sun repair hair balm | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |