USPTO serial 74238921
TT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick R. Roche
PATRICK R ROCHE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | induction heaters for commercial and industrial use | ABANDONED | Nov 8, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |