USPTO serial 74238972
GRAND SLAM TENNIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAND SLAM TENNIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Einhorn
DAVID A EINHORN ANDERSON KILL OLICK & OSHINSKY PC666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing; namely, basic shirts and T-shirts, blouses, skirts, slacks, pants, jeans, sweaters, and dresses; outerwear; namely, coats, raincoats, parkas, blazers, jackets and wind-resistant jackets; accessory apparel; namely, ties, hats, headbands, wristbands, and caps; sportswear; namely, jerseys, swimsuits, shorts, boxer shorts, tanktops; basic and fashion fleece clothing; namely, jogging and warm-up suits, sweatpants and sweatshirts; and basic and fashion footwear; namely, socks, shoes, casual slip-on shoes, sneakers, sandals, and golf and tennis shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |