USPTO serial 74239065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | molding dies, machines for manufacturing molding dies, molding press machines and injection molding machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electronic and scientific apparatus; namely, diodes, light emitting diodes, electroluminescence device, transistors, phototransistors, selenium rectifiers, resistors, fuses, voltage regulators, electronic welders, electroplating apparatus for forming super hard coatings on the surface of a molding die, electric apparatus for removing molten solder from a soldered joint, ultrasonic abrasive apparatus, switches, relays and photorelays, photographic strobe lights, electric displays, operator display and control panels and parts thereof for use in vehicles, in office equipment and in industrial equipment, light meters for measuring and fixing a shutter speed or diaphragm of cameras, liquid crystal displays for motor vehicles and for electronic equipment, electronic photoreceptors, noise suppressors, electrophotographic erasers, electronic power supplies for microcomputer equipment, for office automation equipment, for communication equipment and for numerically controlled equipment, railway signals, image scanners, liquid level meters | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | medical instruments and apparatus; namely, oximeters | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | motorcycle and automotive electric lamps; namely, side marker lights, fog lights, sealed beam headlights and bulbs, search lights, tail lights, spotlights, backup lights, license plate lights, stop lamps, brake stop lights, warning and indicator lights, pole lights, electric lights and electric light bulbs, electric bulbs and halogen bulbs, discharge lamps, automotive lamps, parts of electric lights; namely, lenses and reflectors, flood lights, fluorescent lamp[s, specialized light bulbs for miniature lamps and wedge base lamps | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | land vehicle parts; namely, control actuators, complete directional signal system comprised of turning signal lamps, flasher units and indicators | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |