USPTO serial 74239103
NATURE'S GROVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE'S GROVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen H. Harrison, Jr.
ALLEN H HARRISON JR DONELAN, CLEARY, WOOD & MASER, PC1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 750WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | soft drinks containing water with juices and/or fruit flavorings and soft drinks containing iced tea with juices and/or fruit flavorings | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |