Drawing for TRESSEFFEX

USPTO serial 74239187

TRESSEFFEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDONALD, MARY KAY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRESSEFFEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce D. Kuyper

BRUCE D KUYPER IRELL & MANELLASTE 9001800 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair care products; namely, hair shampoos and conditionersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 1994OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 1994ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 18, 1994OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 3, 1993OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 24, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance