USPTO serial 74239198
ELEGANCE BOUTIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEGANCE BOUTIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda L. Berkowitz
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, jeans, trousers, shirts, blouses, dresses, coats, slacks, underwear, sweaters, jackets, belts, shoes, sandals, slippers, suits, jumpers, bathing suits, sleepwear, sportswear; namely, jogging suits, T-shirts, shorts, Bermuda shorts, cyclist trousers, polo shirts, and sports shirts, gloves, scarves, neckties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |