USPTO serial 74239226
MARQUIS SPAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2409664Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2000
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARQUIS SPAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Independence, OR
Independence, OR
Independence, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Havel
Paul L. Havel MILLER NASH LLP111 S.W. Fifth AvenueSuite 3400PORTLAND, OR 97204-3699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | whirlpool baths and spas in the nature of heated pools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |