USPTO serial 74239356
LACROIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LACROIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6000 Frankfurt am Main 73, DE
6000 Frankfurt am Main 73, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathy J. McKnight
KATHY J MCKNIGHT BANNER, BIRCH, MCKIE & BECKETTELEVENTH FL1001 G ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fresh, canned and frozen delicatessen products; namely, meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; processed mushrooms; dried fruits and dried vegetables; fish, meat, fruits and vegetables in aspic; fruit jams; mixed pickles; soups; packaged meals primarily consisting of meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, game and/or fruit; salad dressing; cranberry sauce; applesauce; cheese; and edible oils | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | pies filled with meat, fish and/or vegetables; sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |