USPTO serial 74239786
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | photographic chemicals; photocopier chemicals; developer; toner, fixing and finishing solutions, all being chemicals for photographic and/or reprographic purposes; sensitized photographic film; photosensitive paper; emulsions for use in the manufacture of printing plates | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | printing presses, sheet feeding machines; machines which process printing plates; printing plates; impact printers; sheet diffusion transfer plates; projection speed plates; off-set printing presses; printing cylinders, drums, presses; and parts and fittings therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electric, electronic, photographic, reprographic, optical and control apparatus and instruments; namely, computers, photocopiers, printers, cameras, contact frames, printing-down frames and processors; apparatus for the recording, transmission or reproduction of images; namely, printers, facsimile transmitters and receivers, laser recorders; blank magnetic data carriers in the form of wire, disc and tape; cameras; data processors; computers; facsimile machines; photocopying machines; printers; word processors; plotters; semiconductor and disc memory units; apparatus and instruments all for the storage, retrieval, transmission or display of data; namely, computers, word processors, data processing apparatus and magnetic data carriers; drying units for photographic prints; and parts for all the foregoing | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |