USPTO serial 74240123
IDENTICHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREER, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDENTICHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Earl C. Hancock
EARL C HANCOCK3445 PENROSE PL #210BOULDER, CO 80301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | transponders containing microchips for cooperating with the radio signals from interrogating devices for automatic bearer identification and equipment for implanting the transponders in fish, pets, and animals | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1989 |
| 016 | transponders containing microchips for cooperating with the radio signals from interrogating devices for automatic bearer identification and equipment for implanting the transponders in fish, pets, and animals | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |