USPTO serial 74240229
TRIOZAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIOZAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenford, Middlesex UB6 0NN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dickerson M. Downing
DICKERSON M DOWNING MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the prevention, treatment and/or alleviation of ulcers and gastro-intestinal diseases and ailments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |