USPTO serial 74240474
POWERPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne Hiaring, Esq.
ANNE HIARING ESQ LAW OFFICE OF ANNE HIARING60 ARBORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | point of sale and inventory control system comprising cash registers with CRT (cathode ray tube) displays, computer receipt printer, computer keyboard and free-standing optical scanner automated by remote computer hardware for use in retail pharmacies and drug stores | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1994 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |