USPTO serial 74240614
SINTER BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SINTER BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sylvester R. Jaime
SYLVESTER R JAIME15915 KATY FWY STE 112HOUSTON, TX 77094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | air blasting media for industrial use on metal and stone surfaces for scouring and abrasive purposes for removing rust, paint, grime, mill scale, imperfections and the like | ABANDONED | Oct 9, 1987 |
| 003 | high strength high conductivity media for oil and gas well fracturing use in shallow wells and deep wells for preventing closure | ABANDONED | Oct 9, 1987 |
| 019 | roadmaking material use for surface finishing for anti-skid paving | ABANDONED | Oct 9, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |