USPTO serial 74240763
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NATURAL BEAUTY PRODUCTS LIMITED
Mid Glamorgan, CF31 3RT, GB
NATURAL BEAUTY PRODUCTS LIMITED
Mid Glamorgan, CF31 3RT, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome Marger
JEROME MARGER MARGER JOHNSON MCCOLLOM & STOLOWITZ650 AMERICAN BANK BLDG621 S W MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet preparations; namely, preparations for the care of the skin, scalp and the body, namely, creams, milks, gels, oils, and balms; suntanning preparations; preparations for reinforcing and strengthening nails; preparations for use in the bath; namely, crystals, beads, and bath soaks; gels and foam preparations for use in the shower; preparations for toning the body; namely, creams, milks, gels, oils and balm; all aforementioned being non-medicated; perfumes; aftershaves; shaving foams and creams; cosmetics; namely, lipsticks, foundation, facial make-up in the form of cream and powder, eyeliner, mascara, make-up removing preparations; eau de cologne; toilet waters; soaps; namely, essential oil-type and deodorant-type for personal use; talcum powders; essential oils for personal use; preparations for the hair; namely, shampoo, conditioner, hairspray, hair gels, hair mousse, and hair wax; antiperspirants; deodorants for use on the person; dentifrices; diplatories; cleansing masks for the face | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |