USPTO serial 74240824
AQUA-TALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENDERSON, KEITH L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUA-TALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear for men, women and children | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
- Other trademarks owned by Marvin Krasnow Enterprises LTD./Les Enterprises Krasnow LTEE
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AQUA-TALIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |