USPTO serial 74240839
CHERRY BOMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2000149Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 1996
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHERRY BOMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chesterfield, MO
Chesterfield, MO
Chesterfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard W. Gerdelman
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY, LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | carbonated soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |