USPTO serial 74240969
ELEVEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEVEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Banyan Springs Investments Limited
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Banyan Springs Investments Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Bereskin
DANIEL R BERESKIN BERESKIN & PARRSCOTIA PLZ BOX 40140 KING ST W 40TH FLTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical apparatus used to elevate bandages slightly away from the skin to protect wounds and promote healing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |