Drawing for NAMCO AMUSEMENT ZONE

USPTO serial 74240995

NAMCO AMUSEMENT ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACK, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAMCO AMUSEMENT ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Schatzel

THOMAS E SCHATZEL LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS E SCHATZEL, PC3211 SCOTT BLVD STE 201SANTA CLARA, CA 95054UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041family entertainment centers; namely, providing facilities for playing video games, redemption games, merchandising games and pin ball machinesABANDONEDDec 21, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 10, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance