Drawing for CITIZENS JURY

USPTO serial 74241108

CITIZENS JURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1834098Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 1994
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CITIZENS JURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WATER C. LINDER

WATER C LINDER FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042organizing panels of citizens for evaluating political candidates and elected officials, and for determining major policy issuesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 13, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 27, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 17, 2004RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 17, 200489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 13, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 2, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 10, 2000PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Apr 21, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 3, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 30, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Jun 1, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance