USPTO serial 74241109
MONTEREY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTEREY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Berg
RICHARD P BERG LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts, eggs, edible marine products and basic and semi-processed pork and beef products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |