USPTO serial 74241380
GRANT MACKENZIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRANT MACKENZIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Calvaruso
JOSEPH A CALVARUSO MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing and apparel; namely, formal suits, cotton sweaters, wool sweaters, ties, scarves, socks, sport jackets, long sleeve sport shirts, polo sport shirts, short sleeve sport shirts, T-shirts, suits, jersey knits, denim pants, dress pants, sport pants, belts, blazers, coats, fancy dress shirts, formal dress shirts, overcoats and trench coats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |