USPTO serial 74241804
SUNRYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 1998
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 703 means Section 8 was accepted and a Section 15 incontestability declaration is pending USPTO review. The registration remains active while Section 15 is processed. Monitor TSDR for Section 15 acceptance (often status 702).
Need help with SUNRYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
ROUGEMONT, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
Stephen J. Jeffries Holland & Knight LLP800 17th Street NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dehydrated fruits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sun-Rype Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sun-Rype Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sun-Rype Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by A. LASSONDE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SUNRYPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 6, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |