USPTO serial 74241928
PATH WATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATH WATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN DANN DORFMAN HERRELL AND SKILLMAN, PCSTE 7201601 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security systems comprising personal security alarms for individuals to provide distress signals to monitoring stations; security system equipment for sensing individual distress signals and relaying the same to a monitoring system; security equipment for monitoring activity of a security system receptive to distress signals provided by individuals within a predetermined geographic grid | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of security systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consulting in conjunction therewith security monitoring services and operating security systems comprising security alarms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlantic Coast Alarm, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlantic Coast Alarm, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PATH WATCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1995 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |