USPTO serial 74242230
EAST EAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAST EAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
Fo Tan Yeuk, Shatin, New Territories, HK
Other trademarks owned by EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
Fo Tan Yeuk, Shatin, New Territories, HK
Other trademarks owned by EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, eggs, milk, acidophilus milk, chocolate milk, cheese and cheese substitutes, butter, cream, dairy-based food beverages; edible oils and fats; salad dressing; and fruit preserves | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, flour, bread, pastries, honey, treacle, yeasts, flavored ices, baking-powder, slat, mustard, vinegar, sauces (except salad dressing), spices, and preparations made from cereals; namely, cereal-based snack food, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars, granola, snack food; namely, rice cakes, noodles, vermicelli, spaghetti, rice, pastries, pancakes, macaroni, pizzas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by EAST EAST WONTON NOODLE RESTAURANTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EAST EAST
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |