USPTO serial 74242434
JETCASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2714764Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JETCASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
22200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, FR
22200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, FR
22200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Fields
PAUL FIELDS DARBY & DARBY805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage, suitcases, handbags, garment bags for travel, toiletry cases sold empty, briefcases, wallets, credit and calling card cases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |