USPTO serial 74242512
THERMAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERMAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Murray Schaffer
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RD - STE 344MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | preformed pipe package assembly for hot water boilers | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1995 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |