USPTO serial 74243154
NUTRITIONAL EXCELLENCE ASSURED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRITIONAL EXCELLENCE ASSURED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
JODY H DRAKE SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTDSTE 1203 CRYSTAL PLZ BLDG 12001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY P O BOX 2286ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meats, fish, seafood, poultry and game; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk based chocolate food beverages; yogurt; milk based dips; milk or whey based food beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | foodstuffs for animals | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages; namely, fruit juices, fruit drinks, mineral and seltzer water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitafort International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Vitafort International Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NUTRITIONAL EXCELLENCE ASSURED
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |