Drawing for MACHINERY RING

USPTO serial 74243193

MACHINERY RING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHN, DEBBIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MACHINERY RING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonard C. Mitchard

LEONARD C MITCHARD NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22000-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036brokering of farm services between farmers and farm labourers and owners and operators of farming equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 5, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 24, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 27, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance