USPTO serial 74243235
CDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. O'Connor
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs featuring computer databases in the field of chemicals and the chemical industry and market | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | user manuals for use with computer databases and information services regarding chemicals and the chemical industry and market | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer services; namely, leasing access time to a computer database in the field of chemicals and the chemical industry ad market | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |