USPTO serial 74243832
CHARTERAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1996
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHARTERAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sylvia A. Petrosky
SYLVIA A PETROSKY2273 SMITH RDAKRON, OH 44333UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing transportation of freight by air | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Jan 7, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Oct 22, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | โ |
| Aug 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Nov 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | โ |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | โ |
| Jan 19, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |