USPTO serial 74243932
PROGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Clemens
WILLIAM J CLEMENS HOWARD & HOWARDTHE PINEHURST OFFICE CTR1400 N WOODWARD AVE STE 250BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | equipment for the installation of electrical and hydraulic passenger elevators, electrical and hydraulic freight elevators and mechanical escalators, and parts therefor; namely, hoistways, hoistway enclosures, hoistway doors and gates and related interlocks, elevator cars, hoisting ropes, sheaves and counterweights, hydraulic driving machines, guide rails, balustrades and handrails, escalator steps, step chains and combplates, trusses and supporting structures | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | equipment for electronically, optically and acoustically controlling and monitoring the operation of elevators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |